Showing posts with label Catherine Hennessey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catherine Hennessey. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

CATHERINE HENNESSEY: New direction for museum

As published in The Guardian, Nov 2, 2016


Let us not move too fast; ponder together what is best, how to proceed


Founders Hall is now up for sale. It has been touted as a possible site for a new provincial museum.

Yes, it is true we are the only province without a provincial museum and we have been on the lookout for one since 1880.
We took steps in 1964 with the memorial to the Fathers of Confederation and again in 1973, creating a network of heritage sites under the wing of the new P.E.I. Heritage Foundation.
Then in 2001, Founders Hall took shape in a very carefully restored railway building, although one has to admit the exhibits were far more for tourists than for Islanders.
The point I am trying to make is that we have done something, but as we have done things, the sector has changed and we would have been unfair to ourselves if we built - as we would have - had we moved for the ‘real thing’ on those past occasions.
To build for the 2020s we must pause and ask what exactly should be built. No doubt some of you have visited the new Halifax Library or The Rooms in St. John’s. Very interesting places that make me think.
Before we move too fast, let us contemplate a direction – one that fits our needs and that we can afford, both as a capital exercise and an apportioned one.
And before we go too far, should heritage foundation and museums, natural history groups, the library and archivists all be sitting down together and talking about it – and then they should invite others in to join them.
For one thing, just take a look at how, at both the Halifax Library and St. John’s – and many other places for that matter - are dominated by a bay of computers that could answer the common needs of all.
Please, please let us not move too fast and let us ponder together what is best for us and how we should proceed.
One roof sounds good to me. Leadership is essential.
 - Catherine Hennessey, Charlottetown’s best-known heritage activist, has been working to preserve and protect the city's historical distinctiveness for many years

Monday, January 12, 2015

Charting a Course: A Study of Heritage in Prince Edward Island

It was September, 2008 a study team headed by The IRIS Group, including Diane Griffin, Harry Baglole, Yvette Doucette drew on the skills of Andrea Arbic, Ann Howatt Ph.D, Monica MacDonald Ph.D, Terry Ruddell Ph.D, Robert Frame, and Georges Arsenault to produce a report called Charting A Course: The Study of Heritage on PEI, for the Prince Edward Island Department of Communities, Cultural Affairs & Labour.

This week I came across this important report and was reminded that precious little has been done since to move ahead on the recommendations of this important study. Once again we find ourselves with another important report sitting on a shelf — a very long shelf — with reports calling for action on developing a proper provincial museum, with the capacity to fulfil its mandate.

. . .the sense of urgency felt by Islanders about what is at stake — what is being endangered and lost. Collections, buildings and landscapes are among the many heritage areas at risk. The need and desire for immediate action is great.
- Executive Summary
Charting a Course: A Study of Heritage in Prince Edward Island

Ian Scott,
Charlottetown
Jan 12, 2015

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

A cultural complex in the Dominion Building

Opinion - as published in The Guardian on Feb 2, 2009

Now that the federal stimulus budget has been passed, let's not forget our government's promise of a new provincial museum. Since a potential location and edifice already exist in the form of the Dominion Building, the Island has a project that is far beyond 'shovel ready'.

The 176,000 square feet of this six-storey structure would provide an ideal location for a provincial museum of culture and nature, with space for a children's museum, as well as for the provincial archives and library. A purpose-built institution may be an ideal, but it would cost more and take longer to realize than recycling an older building.

Many successful museums and cultural complexes have been created in structures where money was spent not on their site or their construction but on their renovation. The Dominion Building's need of new windows, humidity controlled areas and a serious facelift are not unusual ones.

Successful renovations of older structures are too numerous to list but an exemplary one was the National Museum of Science and Technology in Ottawa. The institution grew out of an old bakery made of steel and concrete to become one of Canada's most popular museums during the 1970s and 1980s. Others include a 19th-century prison recently integrated into Quebec's provincial art museum, and an old train station transformed into the Quai D'Orsay, one of the most talked about art galleries in Paris.

The large Dominion Building can accommodate a comprehensive museum, the provincial archives and library and their collections. Centralizing these institutions would facilitate synergies between archivists, curators and librarians and create much-needed efficiencies in space, equipment and personnel. The building could also support complementary educational and entertainment facilities for community and special events.

A cultural centre in a renovated space could work well for teachers, as object-based learning is an excellent complement to that found in schools. Partnerships between the Confederation Centre, the Arts Guild and the MacKenzie Theatre would facilitate the creation of a cultural cluster and in so doing increase educational, leisure and commercial activities for everyone.

The economic and socio-cultural impact of museums and libraries on the revitalization of cities is well documented. Examples include new museums and libraries in Copenhagen, London, Paris, Vancouver, Hull, Montreal and Quebec City. As more residents and tourists are drawn to these institutions, the surrounding neighbourhoods are transformed.

For Charlottetown, the creative use of the Dominion Building would do much more than help counter the flight of businesses from the downtown core.

The creation of a cultural complex and cluster in our capital will create an ambient area where people will converge, where creativity and knowledge will abound, and where business will thrive. As people learn more about the full scope of Island history, they would be directed to regional centres that possess additional artifacts and information concerning different facets of our past and present. A central cultural complex would act as a lead institution, providing leadership, as well as better access to advice, support and training for professionals and volunteers.

As Catherine Hennessey wrote in a recent article of The Island Magazine, people have been dreaming of and planning for a provincial museum since the 1880s. Isn't it time for our governments to seize the occasion to provide Islanders with a dynamic facility that connects them with each other, as well as to their pasts and future?

Terry Ruddel is a former curator of the National Museums of Canada and a former director of Museum Studies at the University of Toronto. He is presently working on the history of blacksmiths in Victoria.

Monday, December 22, 2008

Dominion Building as a museum?

The Guardian - EDITORIALS - published Dec 22, 2008
The old capital landmark is front-runner in search for provincial museum building.

The grand old lady of Charlottetown may have a lot of years left in her yet with suitors aplenty knocking on the door. The latest group to court the former Dominion Building, a landmark in the capital city for over 50 years, is a firm assessing the site for a provincial museum.

Lundholm Associates, a firm which specializes in planning and designing museums, is assessing the feasibility of converting the building into a museum site. It's important to stress that the future use for the former Dominion Building has yet to be determined. But when government said recently it was looking to locate a provincial museum in a central location, the first site on many minds was the six-storey structure on lower Queen Street. A Canada Lands Company spokesman said that many members of both the public and provincial government have commented the facility is "an absolutely perfect site" for a provincial museum. The huge building would certainly have other uses, yet to be determined.

The building was once the main post office for the city and housed most federal agencies and offices for many years. The structure was declared redundant and replaced by the new Jean Canfield Building. It needs a major facelift and modernization before it can be re-occupied. It's a huge structure of 53,645 square metres on a .72-hectare site, or 176,000 square feet on 1.5 acres.

And it will take a lot of money to bring it up to modern specifications. Who will be able to come up with the kind of cash needed to bring the building well into the 21st century?

When city heritage activist Catherine Hennessey held a 75th birthday party earlier this fall, she made a point of having the party on the top floor of the old federal building with a sweeping panoramic view of the city as the sun set. It was a special sight staged for the benefit of some key movers and shakers in the city and province, to hammer home just how special a location and building exists in the heart of the downtown, and how essential it is for the city to keep the building in use. Hennessey and her supporters would like nothing better than to have the building converted into a museum.

The province is stressing that proper planning is needed for a new museum facility to ensure it meets the expectations and needs of the people of P.E.I. But there can be little doubt that the building is among the front-runners as the location for the provincial museum.

Earlier this year, Canada Lands Company sent out 25 packages across the country to those companies and individuals expressing a desire to purchase and develop the building. So there is considerable interest in the building and care must be taken to ensure it's used properly in the future.

An open house held last January identified office, retail, institutional, hotel, residential and cultural uses such as a modern public library, archival and museum services. Other options include a hotel and condominiums but that would not necessarily complement the heritage district. The CLC is hoping to have people back in the building in 2010 which doesn't leave a lot of time to plan and to ensure the building continues to be an integral part of a vibrant downtown Charlottetown.



Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Province commits to creation of central museum


David Keenleyside, left, executive director of the P.E.I. Museum and Heritage Foundation, Philip Macdonald, vice-chair, and Heritage Minister Carolyn Bertram, announced Friday the province will commit to creating a centrally located provincial museum and will also work to develop a heritage strategy. Guardian photo

by JIM DAY as published in The Guardian, 15th of Nov, 2008


The future site for showcasing the province’s past appears likely destined to be in the Charlottetown area.
Heritage Minister Carolyn Bertram pledged Friday her government’s commitment to creating a centrally located provincial museum facility.

Further analysis will be done to peg the specific location, but the recommendation from a heritage report released Friday clearly seems to place the capital city as the prime candidate.

Bertram said the location would be centrally located in a place with the highest potential for visitors to the site.

“We are not going to prejudge where it is going to be, that is part of the (upcoming) process,’’ she said when asked if the site will inevitably end up in the capital city.

Still, the crowd gathered inside the main theatre of Province House cheered Bertram’s promise to create a centrally located provincial museum facility.

The previous Conservative government was ready for construction of a provincial artifactory in Murray River but the Liberal election victory in late May 2007 brought those plans to an abrupt halt.

The proposed $4.9-million project to house and display some of the more than 80,000 items of historical significance now being stored in the West Royalty Industrial Park also included a retail and boutique attachment as a way to stimulate more summertime business in this quiet fishing village.

But while the relocation bid was applauded by the P.E.I. Heritage Foundation, it drew the ire of other heritage buffs who insisted Murray River was too far off the beaten track and the province should be building a provincial museum instead in the capital city.

Bertram hopes to see the museum open within “the next few years’’ but future analysis — and capital budget approval — is still needed to determine many factors for the promised facility. Among the unanswered questions is where will the museum be located, will it be housed in an existing building or will a new facility be constructed and what will be displayed in the facility.

Bertram says it is important for the government to undertake proper planning for a new facility to ensure it meets the expectations and needs of Islanders.

She also wants her government to support capital upgrades to the current seven provincial museums that dot the Island.

The $60,000 report, called Charting A Course, also calls for government to develop a strategy to guide future planning for heritage. Bertram says government will work immediately to create a strategy.

“Within one year, we will have a series of heritage priorities and specific action areas identified to address various heritage needs,’’ she said. “The strategy will recognize that heritage goes beyond bricks and mortar — heritage is a way of thinking about our Island community.’’

That philosophy sits well with Catherine Hennessey, a vocal advocate for the promotion and preservation of the Island’s heritage.

“I have a belief in a museum, but I have a deep belief that we can put a group of people together — a staff — that will help one end of this Island to the other interpreting and preserving our history,’’ she said following Friday’s announcement. “The call is out now for the community to support this wonderful first step.’’

More than 500 individuals and organizations came forward with their concerns and suggestions in helping the IRIS group prepare its report.

Other recommendations in the report include:

  • - Making more effective use and enforcement of existing legislation, notably the Heritage Places Protection Act. Proclaiming the Archaeology Act and developing regulations.
  • - Strengthening and clarifying the mandates regarding administration and provincial heritage resources.
  • - Giving more prominence to heritage concerns within government as part of the decision-making process.
  • - Increasing support for community museums through the Community Museums Association

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

"Dollars for one project while there are no dollars to save the other. What is real?"

as published in the Eastern Graphic - March 28, 2007
by Catherine Hennessey

Letter to the Editor
I believe if people in authority or in the development fields understood our Island history better, the distinctiveness of our communities would shine through and we would not be building and destroying the very special nature of this fair isle. Almost fifty years Dr. Francis Bolger came back to PEl with his doctorate in History to teach, for the first time, PEl history at the university level. Over the years he taught thousands of Islanders in his own special way. Some of those former students are even in government today. It was difficult to leave his class without caring deeply for our island. The visitors that I have met over the years and have had the privilege of introducing to so many aspects of this island, love what is real and I always leave those ,touring experiences feeling we're blessed here. The recently released TIAPEI study on Cultural Tourism might have a handle on that. I hope so.

Rural PEl like rural areas all over Canada is suffering today. They have huge problems to face in the 21st C, but if we jump to addressing those problems by snapping on urban to rural and building out of scales , without appreciation for what is special of rural we will soon have no there, there. We need a serious time of contemplation on this subject.

I am so very sorry that the PEl Museum and Heritage Foundation artifactory issue is pitting rural against urban, particularly in these days when both have such serious matters to discuss maturely. We have so many natural and historic strengths to build on, why are we wasting energy. Take for example the situation that could present itself this summer if this out of scale, snap-on-age building gets built on one side of the street in Murray River while they are tearing down a 1880's church across the street. Four million, what ever, dollars for one project while there are no dollars to save the other. What is real?

A serious plan as to how we should focus on saving the spectacular statements on our landscape that our ancestors built would be a far more productive exercise while building pride in Islanders. We must begin working on preserving our distinctiveness. Please stop before we spend anymore taxpayers dollars on building more Gateways Villages or Founders Hall that simple to do not speak to Islanders and not very clearly to our visitor.

Wednesday, April 4, 2007

The Search for a Provincial Museum,

Just launched - our sister site called PEI History, has longer articles that may be of interest.

Our first feature is a history of museum development, by Catherine Hennessey, founding executive director of the PEI Heritage Foundation. Called The Search for a Provincial Museum, the illustrated article gives background to the current situation the provincial museum system finds itself in.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

A central home for our heritage


as published in The Guardian March 12, 2007
BY CATERINE HENNESSEY - GUEST OPINION


As a number of consultative meetings are occurring in March concerning a provincial museum, I think it important to note that the Island heritage movement itself has had a long history.

In 1881 a Historical Society was formed, followed a decade later by the creation of a Natural History Society. Members of both groups hoped their collections of artifacts and specimens would find a home in a provincial museum. This wish was rekindled in 1905 when the mayor of Charlottetown, F.F. Kelly and his council, granted space to the Natural History and Antiquarian Society in the Market House for the establishment of a museum "such as is found in the capitals of other provinces."

The idea was raised again in 1927 by Chester McLure, MLA, when he gave an evening lecture on the desirability of a provincial library, museum and art gallery. The next year the Harris family donated paintings, financial support and an endowment to help support an art gallery, a library, an archives and a museum. The Harris Memorial Library and the Art Gallery opened in 1930, but it took a decade before it was recognized that the museum and archives were not going to materialize in this building.

With the end of the Second World War, a children's art centre and an arts and crafts guild were under discussion. Given space by the city in the Market House, and funding from the Kinsmen, an art centre was formed and operated successfully for almost a decade. During the late 1940s and early 1950s, the IODE presented exhibits of "Articles of Historical Interest". At a meeting in Charlottetown of the Royal Commission on the Development of Arts, Sciences and Letters (the Massey Commission), the P.E.I. Adult Education Council reiterated the need for a provincial museum, as well as training for museum professionals.

The story of the Confederation Centre for the Arts (opened in 1964) hardly needs repeating, except to say that the Art Galleryagreed to take care of the Harris Collection. The archives quickly outgrew its space in the centre and now the library looks like it, too, needs extra room. Although space for a museum never materialized, other institutions, under the tutelage of the P.E.I. Heritage Foundation (created in 1970), worked to preserve parts of the Island's heritage.

Now, it is 36 years since the Heritage Foundation Act and we are at another threshold. Having been involved in the preservation of our culture and heritage for over 40 years, I can not let go of the idea that this Island is worthy of a strong, central institution that will preserve, research and interpret our culture for ourselves and our visitors. What breaks my heart is the shrugging of shoulders over the artifactory just being a warehouse and so it does not matter where it is located.

A museum collection is the very soul of an institution: to be protected by a staff, catalogued, studied and interpreted in lectures, published material and exhibitions and then always linked with the stories of our people. It is the hands-on task of staff. The staff of our institution is small and their energies must be protected and used to their maximum. They need the support of UPEI, Holland College, the Provincial Archives and the appreciation of all Islanders.

Although I support a moratorium on all development so we can answer the heritage needs in the 21st century, I can't help but believe that an ideal place to combine all our cultural and hentage needs could be found in the Dominion Building on Queen Street. Its location downtown, opposite the Confederation Centre, would create a cultural and economic magnet for this area. I see more and more people getting behind this idea, but they should not let the opportunity pass without letting their local, provincial and federal representatives know their thoughts. Let us spend tax dollars wisely.

Catherine Hennessey of Charlottetown
is a well known heritage activist.

Friday, March 16, 2007

Murray River a good place for artifactory

as published in The Guardian - March 16, 2007
ROBIN JOHNSTON - Murray Harbour North


It was with excitement that I heard government’s announcement that a new artifactory/museum showcasing our Island’s cultural heritage was to be located in Murray River.

At last, a forward-thinking decision reflecting vision, one that practised inclusion by involving a rural community, rather than excluding it.

There has been an outcry from some involved in Island heritage preservation. I disagree with those who argue that keeping the heritage/cultural collection in Charlottetown is best.

In reference to Catherine Hennessey’s commentary in The Guardian (March 12, 2007), I find her appeal for a “strong, central institution that will preserve, research and interpret our culture” somewhat melodramatic. I do not see how relocating the heritage collection to Murray River would threaten the value of Island heritage.

Ms. Hennessey comments that those involved in heritage/cultural efforts, “need the support of UPEI, Holland College . . . the Provincial Archives.” Is she suggesting that housing the collection a mere hour away from Charlottetown is going to compromise vital communication with the resources she listed? Murray River is not the end of the earth.

If Ms. Hennessey is concerned that a museum located in Murray River would languish unattended or unacknowledged by those interested in the past, I think she is misguided. Every year, countless River area residents act as informal ambassadors, willingly assisting many visitors who come here seeking some connection with their past.

In paragraph seven, she states that heritage efforts “need the appreciation of all Islanders.” Precisely. Our heritage belongs to all of us, not some of us.

Ms. Hennessey says she supports a moratorium on the Murray River proposal so that “We can answer the heritage needs in the 21st century.” Is the implication here that locating such a facility in the River, would somehow be considered a step back in time? Not current, or progressive? I find this offensive.

The plea to centralize our cultural/heritage collection in a downtown building because it would create, “a cultural and economic magnet for this area” is over the top. Is Charlottetown so seriously lacking in economic and cultural development that a proposed artifactory in another location is going to compromise its economic security? I think not.

I applaud the province’s proposal to locate the artifactory/museum in Murray River and promote the continued sharing of our cultural treasures.

Saturday, February 24, 2007

"this Island is worthy of having a strong central body . . . to preserve, research and interpret our culture"


by Catherine Hennessey, founding executive director of the PEI Heritage Foundation - from research on the history of heritage preservation on PEI - January 2006.

Having been involved in the preservation of our culture and heritage for over about 40 years I find myself reviewing our past decisions and wondering. I do believe we have many of the bones in place to build on and we should not let them disappear or let go of the ideas expressed by caring people over the years.

I cannot let go of the idea that this Island is worthy of having a strong central body that will as the Heritage Foundation intended - to preserve, research and intetpret our culture for ourselves and then to share that richness with our visitors. I have come to believe that this can only happen with a centrally located “museum” - whatever that means in 2006. What it means to me is a staff with some professional training who have the ability to multitask. It might mean being taken into the fold by others or by taking others into the fold. It should not mean that there would not be exhibitions held in other venues across the province or even the city. What it should mean is that historic artifacts would be catalogued, studied and preserved and often exhibited, by people trained to do so. It should mean too, that dedicated people who will give time and energy to the cause will be assisted in their efforts by trained persons. It would be a partnership in the best possible way.

Yes, there might be permanent exhibition spaces but more likely there would be changing exhibitions that could travel to different parts of the Island and if interest was shown to places like Calgary, Hamilton etc. where Islanders are hungry for home ties. The subjects that could be tackled are endless.

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Let's Consider What Our Heritage Means to us Before Making Firm Decisions


Published in The Guardian Sept 28, 2006 - Guest Opinion by Catherine G. Hennessey

I believe that with discussions on the artifactory being moved to Murray River, our historical scene deserves to be put in a historical context.

In the late 1960s, it became clear that the Confederation Centre of the Arts was not going to be the institution that was going to look after the preservation and interpretation of this Island's history as promised. Adding urgency to the situation, the Island was beginning its serious move into the 21st century. The Comprehensive Development Plan was in its first stages and the family farm was in a state of flux. To add a visual reality, one could hardly cross on the car ferries without encountering truckloads of antiques leaving the Island.

In the fall of 1969, Premier Alex Campbell called a group of Islanders together to discuss the matter. At the meeting were rural and urban persons, conservatives and liberals, Protestants and Catholics. Two meetings were held and then a third where Ruth MacKenzie, Irene Rogers and I were asked to present a view of Island heritage. Remember, these were the days after the opening of Upper Canada Village, Kings Landing and Expo ‘67 etc. We took the tack that the whole Island was a landscape to preserve and distinctive heritage highlights existed all over.

We suggested that it was not the time to build a heritage village, or a museum. We spoke about our shipbuilding industry, farming and fishing, our mills etc. We also stressed the importance of remembering the, furniture industry, the carriage making, the blacksmiths and the stone cutters. We felt that if a good team, of historians and museum workers; was shaped, with the support of a collection, we could, from a central point, serve and encourage preservation throughout the Island .

As a result of those meetings, the P.E.I. Heritage Foundation Act was passed in the legislature in 1970 and an enthusiastic board of Islanders was appointed. The focus of the institution was to encourage, preserve, collect and market Island heritage first and foremost for Islanders. The foundation opened an office in the Burke Building on Kent Street in January 1971.

They had hardly caught their breath before the ‘73 Centennial Commission, after much debate, decided that the capital dollars made available for the centennial would be directed toward heritage. The committee specified Green Park as the shipbuilding centre, Basin Head for fisheries, Orwell Corner for a rural, crossroads and they recommended an exhibition centre in Summerside. They also gave the foundation dollars to establish a headquarters for themselves. That was how Beaconsfield was acquired. With great foresight they established an endowment fund, with the income to be used for acquisitions, research, publishing, exhibitions and such extra matters that the foundation might direct. It was a huge load for the foundation to take on, but with the help of the Department of Tourism and community boards, all the sites, with the exception of Summerside, opened in 1973. Eptek in Summerside opened in February 1978, but by that time, the foundation had added Elmira Railway Station to its list of sites. Since those days, the Acadian Museum in Miscouche has joined the family. Of course, there are still gaps in historical interpretation; there is still no restored lumber mill nor a flour mill nor are there stories of certain prominent early Islanders like John Cambridge etc.

There was also a question of storage. Although we were blessed with considerable space at Beaconsfield and the collection was being used where appropriate at the different sites, things were getting crowded. Islanders were continuing to bequeath items to the foundation — or they sometimes allowed us to purchase something special — which was a gift in itself.

As we entered the ‘80s, it was clear that we must look for better storage space for the collection, somewhere close by, where staff could easily access, study and conserve the collection as well as creatively stage exhibitions that could travel to other sites. The accession of the artifactory — a word coined by staff member Mary Burnett — is a long story of its own. It is important to note that with some aid from the government, the National Museums, Manpower and . small number of patrons, we acquired a building in the West Royalty Industrial Park, improved its condition and with great relief moved in. That was 25 years ago.

Alas, the weaknesses of the building are shown up more and more as it ages — and the collection continues to grow. Staff has not grown in numbers and as a result the creative use of the collection has been difficult to address. However, it has been remarkable what has been accomplished. Regular exhibitions at Eptek and Acadian Museums and the establishment of the Agricultural Museum at Orwell Corner have added a tremendous dimension. The small staff that has been asked to multi-task and creatively use the limited resources that are available has done a remarkable job.

Today with the Island landscape under stress, churches of every denomination closing, a proposed new artifactory in Murray River (that would further separate the staff), with local museums struggling, a new executive director being sought for the Museum and Heritage Foundation, and concern being expressed about the tourism industry, it seems. like an ideal time to bring together many concerned Islanders to discuss just what our heritage means to us all and how we should address the issues over the next 35 years.

Let us stop, ponder and mull over this issue before serious dollars are spent. The future of heritage is so important to Islanders as well as to our visitors, that good, thoughtful decisions must be made.


Catherine G. Hennessey is a Charlottetown heritage activist.